Insights

Perspective from inside the market.

Writing on the structures and dynamics shaping European renewable asset deployment and energy procurement markets.

Issue 01 · 15 June 2026
9 min read

Offtake Structuring in a Grid-Constrained Europe

When the binding constraint stops being capacity and becomes connection, offtake structures evolve beyond what they were originally built to do. Curtailment risk, contractual basis, and a lengthening commissioning timeline are now doing more of the work than the capital-and-capacity vintage was built for.

Read
Field notes

Compressed observations from inside the market.

Note 03 · June 2026

Bilateral vs syndicated offtake

A bilateral PPA matches one seller to one buyer. It works when the buyer is large enough to take a utility-scale volume and creditworthy enough to bank a contract that runs ten or fifteen years. That describes a fairly small club.

Most energy-intensive demand sits outside it. A mid-sized manufacturer, food producer or industrial site may want long-term clean power as much as any major buyer, yet on its own it tends to fail one of two tests: its load is too small to anchor a utility-scale project, or its balance sheet is too light to make a long-dated PPA bankable. Self-consumption helps at the margin, though it is capped by the site, leaves the rest of the supply with the utilities, and adds no new large-scale renewables to the system.

Syndicated offtake is how that demand gets access. It aggregates many small and mid-sized buyers into a single block with the volume and the collective credit to underwrite a new, utility-scale asset. The transition needs the buyers it has been leaving out, and those buyers need a route to clean power they can genuinely call their own.

Moving from one counterparty to several changes the structure of the deal itself. Credit has to be assessed across the whole group. Volume has to be apportioned so the deal survives one party leaving. The terms a single large buyer would set alone become terms a set of buyers has to hold in common.

That complexity earns its place. It is the cost of matching utility-scale supply on one side to fragmented demand on the other, and the price of opening the PPA market to the companies it has so far passed by.

Note 02 · June 2026

Energy procurement and strategy are related questions that ask different things of the buyer. Procurement is the transaction: securing supply at the right price, on the right terms, for the right duration. Strategy is about the position a company occupies in relation to its energy costs over time, and how that position interacts with the underlying economics of the business. The same contract creates different strategic exposures depending on the company holding it. Two buyers can sign the same contract for entirely different reasons, and the logic behind each is what shapes whether the contract holds up.

Note 01 · June 2026

There are two ways AI enters a firm. It can be layered onto an existing way of working. It can also be built into the structure of the firm itself. The difference matters. In an additive model, the partner remains the bottleneck, and the work product is shaped by how much of it one person can hold. In a structural model, a small senior team operates with the analytical depth and delivery pace of a much larger institution. The judgement remains human; what changes is what the human work can do.

Showing 3 most recent